During a meal with a client the other day, she mentioned that a
division in her company was deploying a task force to develop a
social media strategy. Whilst I understood the sentiment, I
explained that this seemed like the wrong thing to do. I was obviously
accused of heresy and ignoring the most important transformation in
marketing communications since Johannes Gutenburg developed the
printing press in 15th Century. After all, which self-respecting
company doesn’t have a fully defined social media strategy?
Let me explain. Back in the bubbly days at the end of the last
millennium, everybody was talking about how to define and adopt a
new media strategy. These days, nobody would consider a new media
strategy, but instead how digital should be used as part of a broader
marketing communications plan. It’s the same with social media.
Don’t think about engaging with your customers in social silos or having a knee jerk reaction to your CMO
saying “we need a Facebook fan page”. Look at first understanding
your target audience and what you want to achieve through your
communications. This should then help you to define your
communications strategy. It’s only at this point that you’ll be
able to define which marketing channels to use and whether social
platforms are even relevant within this plan.
Reassuringly, a workshop at our recent Social Media Huddle
made me realise that we’re now at a point where many of our
technology clients are truly starting to integrate social media into
their marketing plans. By doing this, they’re now able to add higher
levels of engagement, collaboration and create dialogue with
their prospects, customers and channel through social platforms.
Without losing sight of the fact that these activities are part of a
broader marketing mix, involving paid media, search and more
traditional communication vehicles.
Thursday, 18 November 2010
Wednesday, 10 November 2010
How Salesforce.com do social
The final presentation at last week’s Social Media Huddle was from Xabier Ormazabal. He’s Senior Manager, Product Marketing over at Salesforce.com.
His 25 minute slot was filled with a huge amount of insight and
actionable advice. Here’s a quick summary of the points I took
from it.
Salesforce.com build their social media strategy around three pillars of online community. Seems like a pretty straight forward model:
A good suggestion that came out of this last pillar was how to calculate a rough ROI for your social activities. For example, first calculate how much a video costs to create and to upload to YouTube. Then, ascertain the £/$ value of a video view (that’s the tricky bit, but any media buyer should be able to give you a figure). Multiply this value by the number of views and divide by the cost. Easy!
There was also a debate about whether people should have multiple accounts on Twitter e.g. their “work” profile and their “personal” profile. The audience seemed split on this topic. I personally prefer a single account @Wrigsy where I Tweet about a broad range of topics (from climbing mountains to our latest new business wins). But, I suppose I’m lucky that I can also Tweet through our Banner account @BannerCorp when the topic is purely focused on work.
If you’re a salesforce.com user, start using Chatter. It’s their most successful product launch to date and gives users the sort of communication and collaboration they expect from platforms like Facebook.
Salesforce.com build their social media strategy around three pillars of online community. Seems like a pretty straight forward model:
- First ensure that your corporate site and other owned web properties are working hard for you. Focus on building engagement through knowledge sharing, user groups, blogs and ideas sharing.
- Secondly, create your own branded channels on existing social platforms. Use listening tools like Radian6 to understand what people are saying and where they’re saying it. Engage with people where they spend their time and distribute your content across YouTube, Twitter, Flickr and Slideshare.
- Finally, create conversations across the web on sites where you don’t have branded channels e.g. Twitter, third party blogs, forums and partners sites. And, make sure your social media guidelines are up to date and disseminate the policies to your content creators.
A good suggestion that came out of this last pillar was how to calculate a rough ROI for your social activities. For example, first calculate how much a video costs to create and to upload to YouTube. Then, ascertain the £/$ value of a video view (that’s the tricky bit, but any media buyer should be able to give you a figure). Multiply this value by the number of views and divide by the cost. Easy!
There was also a debate about whether people should have multiple accounts on Twitter e.g. their “work” profile and their “personal” profile. The audience seemed split on this topic. I personally prefer a single account @Wrigsy where I Tweet about a broad range of topics (from climbing mountains to our latest new business wins). But, I suppose I’m lucky that I can also Tweet through our Banner account @BannerCorp when the topic is purely focused on work.
If you’re a salesforce.com user, start using Chatter. It’s their most successful product launch to date and gives users the sort of communication and collaboration they expect from platforms like Facebook.
Thursday, 4 November 2010
POWNAR - the power of news and recommendation
CNN have certainly pushed the boundaries
when it comes to exploring the power of recommendation and the
value of shared content. Their global research initiative Pownar,
illustrates why people share content, how they share it and the type
of content they prefer to share. In the US
and Europe, people tend to share content for altruistic reasons,
whereas in Asia, sharing content is more about broadcasting your
status. As you might suspect, articles with embedded video and
images are most likely to be shared. And, Facebook is the primary
platform used for sharing.
Most interesting from the research is the effect that sharing has on the person who is sharing the content and those receiving it. People are 3.7 times more engaged with content that has been recommended. And, those who share the content are 2 times more engaged.
There’s also an interesting uplift in brand metrics. Shared content increases brand consideration by 12%, brand recommendation by 19% and brand favourability by an astounding 19%.
The key actions to take from this research are to assess your content to ensure it’s optimised for recommendation and make it shareable. And, find a lady in Paris to be your individual broadcaster…
Take a look at the attached press release to understand how semiotics, content archetypes and biometrics can be used to understand the effect that shared content can have on your brand.
CNNI POWNAR — the power of news and recommendation
Most interesting from the research is the effect that sharing has on the person who is sharing the content and those receiving it. People are 3.7 times more engaged with content that has been recommended. And, those who share the content are 2 times more engaged.
There’s also an interesting uplift in brand metrics. Shared content increases brand consideration by 12%, brand recommendation by 19% and brand favourability by an astounding 19%.
The key actions to take from this research are to assess your content to ensure it’s optimised for recommendation and make it shareable. And, find a lady in Paris to be your individual broadcaster…
Take a look at the attached press release to understand how semiotics, content archetypes and biometrics can be used to understand the effect that shared content can have on your brand.
CNNI POWNAR — the power of news and recommendation
Getting the most out of LinkedIn
LinkedIn is an undeniable force when it comes to B2B
social networks. Henry Clifford-Jones showed us some fascinating
statistics – over 80 million professionals viewing 1.5billion
pages per month across 600,000 professional groups.
When you want to build a group on LinkedIn, it’s only going to be a success if you build it around a common interest and purpose. An empty LinkedIn group can be a very lonely place…
So, the more focused and well-defined the group is, the higher the level of participation and engagement. Also, don’t get too disappointed if most people aren’t contributing. LinkedIn reckon that for every person that contributes on the site, nine will comment and interact, whilst 90 will just sit back and consume the content.
So, what does inPages enable marketers to do?
Well, it does seem that LinkedIn has picked up on a well known fact – recommendations from personal acquaintances are the most trusted form of communication – and introduced a new tab on the company profile page called Products & Services. This areas of the site enables companies to feature information about their products, with onward links to their corporate sites.
But the clever bit here is that the new platform enables members to feature in their profiles the products and services they use and to recommend them. This gives recommendations a new level of credibility – because they’re directly linked to a person’s profile. Thereby overcoming the concerns that many companies actively “massage” product ratings and recommendations on other third party sites. I suspect that many tech marketers are already in a mad rush to get their products and services listed.
However, on reflection, this new platform does raise a number of interesting questions:
When you want to build a group on LinkedIn, it’s only going to be a success if you build it around a common interest and purpose. An empty LinkedIn group can be a very lonely place…
So, the more focused and well-defined the group is, the higher the level of participation and engagement. Also, don’t get too disappointed if most people aren’t contributing. LinkedIn reckon that for every person that contributes on the site, nine will comment and interact, whilst 90 will just sit back and consume the content.
The new inPages Platform
We were also lucky to take a sneak peak at the brand new inPages Platform. Our Huddle saw it just ahead of its global launch in New York. So, a bit of a scoop for our company.
So, what does inPages enable marketers to do?
Well, it does seem that LinkedIn has picked up on a well known fact – recommendations from personal acquaintances are the most trusted form of communication – and introduced a new tab on the company profile page called Products & Services. This areas of the site enables companies to feature information about their products, with onward links to their corporate sites.
LinkedIn Company Products and Services Page
But the clever bit here is that the new platform enables members to feature in their profiles the products and services they use and to recommend them. This gives recommendations a new level of credibility – because they’re directly linked to a person’s profile. Thereby overcoming the concerns that many companies actively “massage” product ratings and recommendations on other third party sites. I suspect that many tech marketers are already in a mad rush to get their products and services listed.
However, on reflection, this new platform does raise a number of interesting questions:
- Will companies need to update their social guidelines to encompass their employees recommending their own products or those from other companies?
- If your profile features a large number of products and services, does this just open you up as a target for sales guys? You’re clearly a person who influences the purchase and based on the number of products, you’ve clearly got the budget…
- Looking at the demo of the platform, there doesn’t seem to be the functionality to provide negative feedback. Surely these are often more important than positive recommendations?
Thursday, 16 September 2010
Creating content for pancake people
Looking back on my youth, I used to pride myself on my ability
to remember all of my friends’ telephone numbers and every
university lecture that I had over the course of a week. Now, such
feats of memory are no longer required of my brain – my mobile devices
and online services remember and manage these tasks for me.
I also used to enjoy getting stuck into long articles and curling up with an 800 page novel. Truth is, these days I find it challenging to read a lengthy online article without following the multiple links embedded within the page, the lure of checking Twitter, my netvibes news feeds and my multiple email accounts. Apparently, I’m not alone – there is a perception out there that the internet is changing our brains (and not always positively), how we consume information and retain knowledge. In effect, Google is becoming a replacement for our long-term memory and almost as quick at retrieving information (take a look at the new Google Instant).
Earlier this year, a client told me that people don’t read web pages anymore and that much of the beautifully crafted copy that we had produced was a waste of time. Instinctively, I fought back against this statement and zealously defended our work. After all, producing content and publishing web pages is one of the reasons we’re in business. However, there have been a number of articles lately that have re-ignited the discussions and changed my mind as to how the internet is altering the way our brains work and, therefore, the way we consume information.
Have we reached a point predicted back in 1985 by Max Headroom where blipverts will be the most effective way of getting our marketing messages across to our target audience; where high-speed, concentrated, high-intensity commercials lasting about three seconds are used to subliminally brainwash the masses?
We may not have reached that point yet, but changing trends in media consumption must have some real implications for marketers. Is the long copy ad dead? Will technology decision-makers no longer have the time or inclination to value whitepapers? Do we need to fundamentally address the taxonomy and content hierarchy of our websites? And, do we need to establish new measures of audience engagement? After all, a page view doesn’t mean a page has actually been read…
Thank you for reading to the end of this post. It must have been difficult not to follow any of the embedded links or checking the status on your social universe… I’d be interested to hear your thoughts.
I also used to enjoy getting stuck into long articles and curling up with an 800 page novel. Truth is, these days I find it challenging to read a lengthy online article without following the multiple links embedded within the page, the lure of checking Twitter, my netvibes news feeds and my multiple email accounts. Apparently, I’m not alone – there is a perception out there that the internet is changing our brains (and not always positively), how we consume information and retain knowledge. In effect, Google is becoming a replacement for our long-term memory and almost as quick at retrieving information (take a look at the new Google Instant).
Pancake People
Back in 2005, the playwright Richard Foreman wrote a piece about ‘Pancake People’, and it’s even more pertinent today than when he wrote it:
“I see within us all (myself
included) the replacement of complex inner density with a new kind of
self – evolving under the pressure of information overload and the
technology of the ‘instantly available’. A new self that needs to
contain less and less of an inner repertory of dense cultural
inheritance – as we all become “pancake people” – spread wide and
thin as we connect with that vast network of information accessed by
the mere touch of a button.“
Earlier this year, a client told me that people don’t read web pages anymore and that much of the beautifully crafted copy that we had produced was a waste of time. Instinctively, I fought back against this statement and zealously defended our work. After all, producing content and publishing web pages is one of the reasons we’re in business. However, there have been a number of articles lately that have re-ignited the discussions and changed my mind as to how the internet is altering the way our brains work and, therefore, the way we consume information.
Have we reached a point predicted back in 1985 by Max Headroom where blipverts will be the most effective way of getting our marketing messages across to our target audience; where high-speed, concentrated, high-intensity commercials lasting about three seconds are used to subliminally brainwash the masses?
We may not have reached that point yet, but changing trends in media consumption must have some real implications for marketers. Is the long copy ad dead? Will technology decision-makers no longer have the time or inclination to value whitepapers? Do we need to fundamentally address the taxonomy and content hierarchy of our websites? And, do we need to establish new measures of audience engagement? After all, a page view doesn’t mean a page has actually been read…
Bite-sized payloads of marketing gold
If the answer to any of the above is “Yes”, then we need to ensure that we’re producing concise marketing messages that are laser-targeted at our audiences. Let’s not create reams of written content that languish on our corporate websites. Instead, let’s embrace the notion of creating more engaging formats of content and distributing it in bite-sized payloads to the platforms where our audiences are spending their time. So that means featuring content on services like Scribd and Slideshare and finding new ways to feature content on publisher websites. It also means making your blog one of the primary destinations for your marketing messages. After all, the content changes regularly and is generally mercifully short.
Thank you for reading to the end of this post. It must have been difficult not to follow any of the embedded links or checking the status on your social universe… I’d be interested to hear your thoughts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)